Illinois Rule 213: The One Rule Lawyers Fear Most in Depositions?

Illinois Rule 213: The One Rule Lawyers Fear Most in Depositions?

Legal memos and social threads buzz about this discovery tool. Clients ask sharp questions about trial surprise. That attention pushes searches for Illinois Rule 213: The One Rule Lawyers Fear Most in Depositions? higher.

What This Rule Covers Illinois Rule 213: The One Rule Lawyers Fear Most in Depositions? is a statutory shortcut. It allows one side to read a prior statement aloud if a witness changes testimony at trial. Courts treat the deposition record as reliable proof.

Why Lawyers Use (and Fear) It Studies indicate juries weigh read statements heavily. Opposing counsel can lock a witness into inconsistent words. This pressure forces careful prep and can steer case strategy.

A party may introduce a deposition that contradicts trial testimony by reading it verbatim to the jury.

Practical Effect That option turns a calm deposition into high stakes. Lawyers listen closely and refine questions accordingly.

FAQ

• When can this rule apply at trial? It applies when a witness denies making a contradictory prior statement under oath.

• Does every inconsistent statement trigger it? Only clear contradictions on material facts generally qualify for this remedy.